Like nature itself, Tu Bishvat has gone though a number of different seasons
throughout its existence. From its Biblical origins as a tax day on fruit trees,
to its Kabbalistic transformation as a nature-mystical holiday, and more
recently as the environmental holiday par excellence of Judaism.
Our tradition is saturated
with nature-sensitive messages, from the charge to “guard” the earth (Genesis
2:15) to the nature-intoxicated words of many of the Psalms, to the sublime
message not to disturb the environment on Shabbat.
The environment is
synonymous with life, and we are commanded in Deuteronomy to “choose life”
(30:19). We know that the condition of our shared global environment is
increasingly vulnerable and that we must act with greater resolve to address its
condition.
One way to
affirm that commitment would be the establishment by the Nobel Foundation of a
Nobel Environment Prize.
As the Tu Bishvat and the seasons change, so has the
Nobel Prize. From 1901 until 1969, Nobel prizes were awarded in Physics,
Chemistry, Physiology or Medicine, Literature and Peace. However, in 1968 the
Nobel Prize in Economics was added and the first award conferred the following
year.
While the
establishment of a new Nobel prize should not be taken lightly, humanity has
entered a new century where Alfred Nobel’s goal to improve the human condition
and the conditions for our survival now face grave challenges caused by the
deterioration of our global environment. The Nobel Prize in Economics was
established by a large donation by the Riksbanken, the central bank of Sweden,
to the Nobel Foundation.
While the prize in Economics was not part of Alfred
Nobel’s original list of prizes as described in his will, it is considered
almost as prestigious. A similar donation by an individual or foundation could
be the catalyst for the establishment of the Nobel Environment Prize.
There are those who will
say that the Nobel Peace Prize is the appropriate venue to recognize outstanding
achievements in the field of the environment, as was done four years ago.
There is a logical
connection between peace and the environment. More and more government agencies,
think tanks and academics understand the connection between the debasement of
environmental conditions and military conflict. Severe drought caused by climate
change has been a factor in the conflict in Darfur. In contradistinction the
environment can serve as an agent for peacebuilding as, for example, seen
through the bridge-building work of the Arava Institute for Environmental
Studies in Kibbutz Ketura.
Continue reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment